home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Subject: Re: cross-gcc
- Date: Sun, 6 Feb 94 12:23:08 CET
- From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.north.de>
- In-Reply-To: <9402030807.AA25372@nugget.cip.physik.tu-muenchen.de>; from "Robert.Wilhelm@Physik.TU-Muenchen.DE" at Feb 3, 94 9:07 am
- Message-Id: <9402061123.AA00946@jelal.north.de>
-
- Robert.Wilhelm@Physik.TU-Muenchen.DE writes:
-
- > > > If anyone's got the sources, can you _please_ tell me where I can FTP
- > > > them from? I don't relish the idea of trying to ftp such a huge file
- > > > from out of North America. Naturally, only 2.5.x versions can be
- > > > found on prep.ai.mit.edu, and those can't produce working 68000 code. :-(
- > >
- > IMHO gcc 2.5.8 is producing 6800 code. There was a optimisation bug
- > in all gcc 2.5.x x<8, but now things seem to work...
-
- you mean no more address errors? can it compile GNU sed 2.03 (rx.c) on
- 68000 now? or a working GEM++?
-
- still skeptic :)
- Juergen
- --
- J"urgen Lock / nox@jelal.north.de / UUCP: ..!uunet!unido!uniol!jelal!nox
- ...ohne Gewehr
- PGP public key fingerprint = 8A 18 58 54 03 7B FC 12 1F 8B 63 C7 19 27 CF DA
-